Transaction effects
Simulation helps reveal transfers, permission changes and other effects before signing.
Transaction Security & Compliance Layer
Add effect checks, policies and risk assessment before operations are signed in your existing system.
Financial institutions with established wallet or transaction infrastructure.
Simulation helps reveal transfers, permission changes and other effects before signing.
T1 uses available context and KYT signals; organisational policies set mandatory restrictions.
Authorisation is bound to a specific operation, key, configuration and cryptographic step.
The grounds for admission, rejection and stops are recorded with the operation context.
The existing system submits the transaction for checking before contacting the signer.
Simulation identifies an expanded permission to use an asset.
Policy prohibits that effect. The operation is rejected before MPC regardless of a favourable risk assessment.
The initiator receives the rejection reason and the decision remains in the record.
This scenario illustrates the product logic. It is not a client case study.
Admission checks must be mandatory for the signer. Alternative signing routes are reviewed and excluded within the integration model. The product name does not imply automatic compliance with every legal requirement.
No signing route in the agreed integration can bypass admission checking.
A favourable risk assessment cannot overcome a policy prohibition.
A rejection retains its reason and request context.
Configure the business process, networks and assets, roles, integrations, deployment model, risk-data sources, stop conditions and audit records. Review the selected plan and deployment requirements before integration.
Deployment stepsFollow intent, checks, admission, signing, publication and external status.
Read guideDefine the configuration, responsibilities and pilot checks.
Read guideCompare monthly plans, included usage and additional costs. Online signup is currently unavailable.